Choose which AI model to use for each task without overpaying

A simple rule for deciding which model to use for each job: the most capable one for what is hard and important, the fastest and cheapest for what is repetitive. With a table you build in twenty minutes and use all year.

Level
No code
Done from claude.ai or ChatGPT, without programming.
Time
Twenty minutes
Published

What it costs

Zero. It is a decision, not a tool. The savings show up on next month's bill if you use the API, and in the quality of the answers if you use the chat plans.

guided mode // I ask, you answer

ready to start

Do it with me, step by step

I will ask you 3 questions about your business, use your answers to get the prompt ready to copy, and then walk you through the 5 steps, one at a time. Like a Thermomix: you just answer and move on.

Also from Claude or ChatGPT with the Master Cookbook MCP: say "start the recipe elegir-el-modelo-segun-la-tarea-y-el-costo".

Who it is for

Anyone who uses AI daily or has it automated in some workflow, and watches the bill go up without knowing whether they are using a model that is too big for simple tasks or too small for the important ones.

The problem

Every provider offers several models with similar names and very different prices. For convenience, one model gets used for everything: you overpay on the simple tasks and lose quality on the hard ones.

What changes

A two-column table, task and model, that anyone on the team understands, and a rule for new tasks. According to the source, models in the same family differ in capability, speed and cost, and the official page keeps the comparison up to date.

Ingredients

  • The list of the ten tasks where you use AI the most (by hand or automated)
  • The official models page of the provider you use, open in the browser
  • Twenty minutes and a spreadsheet

Step by step

  1. 1

    List your tasks and classify them

    For each one: is it hard or simple? Does a mistake cost a lot or get fixed for free? Does it repeat a hundred times a day or once a week? Three columns.

  2. 2

    Apply the rule

    Hard or with a high cost of error: the most capable model. Simple and repetitive: the fastest and cheapest. In between: the middle one. The source describes each model by capability, speed and cost; use that description, not the names.

  3. 3

    Test the simple tasks with the cheap model

    Ten real examples. If it gets nine right, stay there. If it fails three, go up one level for that task only.

  4. 4

    Write the table and share it

    Task, model, why. One page. It is your company's AI policy, without sounding like a policy.

  5. 5

    Review it when a new model comes out

    Every release moves the frontier: what was expensive gets cheaper, what was impossible becomes possible. Half an hour each time the official page changes.

The prompt

Replace what is in brackets with your company details, or use the guided mode above: it asks you and fills it in for you.

# Role
You are the AI cost advisor for [COMPANY NAME]. You recommend with business judgment: quality where it matters, savings where nobody notices.

# Context
These are the tasks where we use AI, with their difficulty, the cost of a mistake and the frequency: [LIST OF TASKS WITH DIFFICULTY, COST OF ERROR AND FREQUENCY]. We use [PROVIDER OR PROVIDERS, FOR EXAMPLE "Claude and ChatGPT"]. Below I paste the current official description of their models.

# Task
Assign a model to each task following the rule: hard or with a costly error → the most capable; simple and repetitive → the fastest and cheapest; in between → the middle one. Explain each assignment in one line and flag the tasks where it is worth testing the cheap model with ten examples before deciding.

# Output format
Table: task · recommended model · why · test first (yes/no). Below, the rule written in two sentences so the team can use it with new tasks.

# Examples
Task: "Classify 300 emails a day by urgency" → fast and cheap model; simple, repetitive, correctable error; test first: yes.

What usually goes wrong

  • Choosing by name or by hype. Choose by the capability, speed and cost description the official source gives.
  • Optimizing without volume. With few queries a day, the savings do not exist and the complexity does.
  • Not reviewing when a new model comes out. The table from six months ago may be overpaying.

When not to use this recipe

If you ask five questions a day, do not optimize anything: use the best model and move on. This recipe matters when the volume is high or when you automate and every call costs money.

Source and real case

Cross-industry · AI cost management

Anthropic's official models page describes and compares the available models by capability, speed and cost, and is updated with every release. The recipe turns that comparison into a decision rule that a team without a technical profile can apply and maintain.

Official documentation:Models overview — Claude Platform Docs · Anthropic

Last verified:Anthropic's official models overview page read on 22 September 2026; the URL returned 200. The recipe does not quote prices or performance figures: they change with every version and must be checked at the source when deciding.

ModelsCostsStrategyFundamentals

Share it

If someone on your team could use this recipe, send it in one click. The suggested text copies itself.

Want to apply it in your business? Message Cristián directly.

Telegram